[轉貼]"Sab consluting group..."等9題

[轉貼]"Sab consluting group..."等9題

台灣英語網1.0 » 週六 8月 22, 2015 9:45 pm

(原PO: ptt上的SAMMY728)
(原標題: [ 多益] 幾題 多益文法的問題,請大家幫忙)
引文: 1.Sab consluting group is less expensive than jen consulting group and its work is (just) as reliable.

我選as well,想說第2家公司也很reliable.

要用"as well"的話,原句子要改成->

".... and its work is reliable as well."

這可以多讀一下(字典上的)例句熟悉一下用法。


引文: 2.MR.Wang's performance is far superior to (that) of his associates.

選項中還有this,those,these,感覺答案好像錯了

that沒錯(對應前頭的performance)。

引文: 3.Cost projections for the next fiscal year should be submitted by the appropriate managers,as (indicated) on the chart below

選項中還有indicating,indicative,indicators

4.They were surprised when they knew that the standard for the safety of the product was much higher than (expected)

選項中還有expecting,expect,expectedly

這兩個都是習慣用法"... as indicated", "... ("比較"性質的字眼/說法) than expected"。多讀讀英文報章雜誌上的例子,或是用Google/Google News/Google Books找例句來看也行


引文: 5.(Oppostion) to the school's new assessment policy has brought together many preciously splintered student group.

選項中還有opposing,oppose,opposite 題目是不是出錯還是答案錯了??

主要句子: Opposition to (something) has brought together ....student groups.

"opposition to"可以查字典上的用法:
Longman ONLINE
http://pewebdic2.cw.idm.fr/
opposition(noun)
....
opposition to


引文: 6.All personnel should be ready to produce their photo ID cards when (asked) to do so (of) a security guard.

這提答案是給of--by ,但是when後面不是要接asking嘛,是不是有兩個錯呢??

.... when (they/you/all personnel are) asked .... by a security guard.

簡單被動式,然後省略了括弧�頭的字,好處是可以避開倒底該選那個主詞的窘況。


引文: 7.The material (A:to be included) in the new advertising brochures (B:have to be checked) by the publicicity officer.

答案是B:have checked,我認為是A:改成which is included 是不是答案錯了呢??

A沒錯,B應該改成"has to be checked"


引文: 8.The rising cost of (A:housing) in major cities (B:has led to) a number of companies to relocate in rural areas.

答案是B:去掉to,但是未啥要去掉呢?lead to 導致,不是一個片語嘛,我認為A的housing是錯的,填house,單純名詞用法.

解答沒錯。"lead"和"housing"可以查字典上的解釋和用法。用"houses"也可以。用單數的話要配合a-> "a house",不過整句讀起來會很奇怪(怎麼會只有一間房子?)。以美國來說的話,類似原句子的表達是常用"housing"-->"...rising cost of housing"

Longman ONLINE
lead (1, verb)
4 CAUSE SOMETHING TO HAPPEN ......
.......
lead somebody to do something
Ex: What led him to kill his wife?


引文: 9.(A:The highest cost) cost of international telephone services is leading many customers (B:to explore) other means of(?有少字喔...) communication.

這題B就沒錯,是A:highest--higt.請問這兩題lead的用法有差嘛??

(highest --> high)-> The high cost of international .....

> 請問這兩題lead的用法有差嘛?
一樣
Site Admin
 
文章: 31478
註冊時間: 週六 8月 15, 2015 3:05 am

誰在線上
正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 0 位訪客